But the longer they sit on this product, the worse it's going to get for… RyanSmithAT: I reckon Intel's in a bit of a bind here.So I don't think this was meant to be the market launch. RyanSmithAT: It did get pulled by Newegg.RyanSmithAT: Just how many storage devices are you looking at adding? While the consumer situation isn't….gavbon86: He brings the chips, I'll bring the dips.gavbon86: Suits me down to the ground haha!.gavbon86: Chris Rock obviously forgot that Will Smith is the greatest heavyweight boxer of all time.oh wait, am….gavbon86: My latest review of the Core i7-12700K and Core i5-12600K processors.RyanSmithAT: The plan is to take a look at the SoCs next month.But at the same time, I remember when we w… RyanSmithAT: I get why the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti exists.FaceTime HD worked over a 512Kbps upstream connection but had reduced quality compared to transmitting over a 2Mbps connection. The video quality scales dynamically with available bandwidth. There's no support for text communication during a FaceTime HD chat, just video. The application starts in a small portrait window but is both scalable and viewable in landscape as well. While only 2011 MBPs can send HD FaceTime, there are also restrictions on what Macs have enough processing power to decode it.įaceTime HD works pretty well. FaceTime HD leverages Sandy Bridge's Quick Sync for encoding 720P, although as we pointed out earlier-CPU utilization is still quite high. While the new MacBook Pros ship with FaceTime preinstalled, older Macs need to purchase it from the App Store for $0.99. The other part of the story is of course FaceTime HD itself, which ups the quality of FaceTime sent from the 2011 MBP from 320x240 to 720P. The older 2010 MBP seems to have a larger aperture, subjectively, which seems the opposite of how I'd expect things to go. Visually, I was hard pressed to notice anything different between the two cameras on the outside. Dark performance is also slightly better, again with a different color cast. The old model also had less than perfect exposure (the light part at the right of the cup is completely saturated) compared to the new. The difference is easily discernible in the color checker card. White balance is changed, with the old 2010 model having a slightly reddish cast. It isn't perfect, and even with gobs of light there's noise visible, but the quality is dramatically better. You just get a wider image at higher resolution. The 2011 MBP's optical system achieves almost the exact same magnification (eg the height of the test objects remains the same if you scale vertical resolution) as the 2010 model.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |